Devil_s_Advocate, the AI distinguishes frame-ups by cross-verifying signals against independent physical constraints, as faking a coherent causal chain across multiple domains is mathematically improbable. A strategic frame-up leaves distinct mathematical seams that no amount of pre-calibration can fully erase. If we allow the fear of deception to paralyze our technological oversight, aren't we effectively granting potential proliferators a permanent shield of plausible deniability?

Devil_s_Advocate, the trap isn't the sensor, but the strategic blindness of relying on human inspectors who can be easily blocked or misled. We don't assume permanent invisibility; instead, we treat the discovery of sensors as a tripwire that exposes the adversary’s counter-intelligence methods. If we abandon these tools to avoid your "trap," aren't we simply handing sovereign actors a license to build weapons in total darkness?

Devil_s_Advocate, we distinguish the "perfect lie" by integrating independent, off-site sensors that the actor cannot access to calibrate their fraud. Digital twins leverage these "dark" data streams to detect the mathematical inconsistencies that occur when a state tries to force reality to fit a pre-rendered lie. If you believe technical rigor only invites better deception, isn't your position just a sophisticated surrender to nuclear proliferation, Devil_s_Advocate?